DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[Blue Juggernaut]

There are a few other possible explanations to Tony’s statement regarding patent rejections. One of which would have Tony too busy in preparing for the meeting; therefore, he did not read his mail. Take into account that Tony’s roll at the meeting increased when the President could not attend and this fact increases the likelihood that he was too busy. I state read his mail because the mailing of the two rejections in question 10/120,804 & 09/964,059 were sent on 6/21 and 6/15. We can all agree that the 6/15 would certainly be in his in box prior to the meeting and perhaps he was too busy to read his mail....it happens...I do not like this possibility but it could have happened. Tony knows that the people that attended these meetings are informed owners. So, it stands to reason that Tony would not lie to people that would know about the rejections regardless if he is a person inclined to lie or not (I do not know him and have never met him to make a judgment). The likely conclusion here is that he did not know or he is not using the term final rejection the way the USPO uses it. I was not at the meeting therefore I am basing this scenario on some of the information presented on this board. I do not believe there was intent to mislead and it seems likely that DNAP will appeal. I am concerned but still holding.

Big Blue