InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 148
Posts 11149
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/30/2005

Re: marayatano post# 37350

Friday, 10/21/2011 7:00:23 PM

Friday, October 21, 2011 7:00:23 PM

Post# of 42851
I was just going to post that the Piers only hope is for a significant recovery is either: 1. a substantial amount of senior claims are disallowed after litigation (and even then, there might be a legal argument that piers still have to live up to their obligation to the seniors outside bankruptcy even though the claims have been disallowed in bankruptcy; however I could see piers arguing that they are not required to pay for the same reasons that were used to disallow the claims); or 2. a settlement agreement is reached wherein the seniors somehow give up their right to pursue the piers for the deficiency payment.

I don't see number 2 happening at all. And the prospects for number 1 are very slim, as I don't see much chance of this going to litigation.

Any legal analysis I post may not be relied upon by anyone for any
purpose. If you want legal advice you can rely on, hire a lawyer.
Federal District Courthouse, Newark

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.