InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 701
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/25/2003

Re: gdepc post# 20240

Tuesday, 06/28/2005 8:16:26 PM

Tuesday, June 28, 2005 8:16:26 PM

Post# of 64738
Your argument makes about as much sense as the silly spat you had with Arnold earlier over the degree to which CYGX Management got their behinds booted in the Waldroff suit. I have nothing to wriggle out of. I have posted your words and added my commentary.

Of course you didn't say "and result in an additional 15% dilution in shareholder value, therefore we should all withhold our votes and proxies." I added that as commentary. Because my post references you total previous post, there is no conflict. If you doubt that, go check the NBC Stylebook.

You did say, "the bottom line is a quorum will surely hurt our company and the progess of the science.."

I agree ... we do not need a quorum.


BTW, in both your and Paulnesses posts, there is frequently a plethora of punctuation errors or an absence of punctuation. How about getting some assistance in composing your posts so that we will understand what you are attempting to say when you say something. Who gave you the verbiage for you post 20233? Sounds to me like you got instructions from someone in management and may have not interpreted it correctly.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.