InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,288.67
(
0.31%
)
Post# of 92948
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

rocky301

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 110
Posts 6480
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/01/2003

rocky301

Re: Spetty772002 post# 34588

Thursday, 10/20/2011 8:36:44 AM

Thursday, October 20, 2011 8:36:44 AM

Post# of 92948
you miss the point entirely. No one is questioning the deals made starting back in 2005, they were what they were. All debt to those holders was paid off the end of 2010. That isn't the problem or the point. ACT allowed settlements under .10 to some holders and JMJ converted and exercised under .10...ACT did not abide by the contract terms and therefore the lawsuits..
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up