Tuesday, October 18, 2011 1:12:20 AM
The fact that the publics questions being answered sufficiently by AQLV with documented and recognized authority, and not by just the company merely stating "because we said so" or some type of "info commercial" tactics, are a intricate part of that validity.
It's one thing to have some fancy filtrated water to put with the rest of the competition, and state we believe ours is healthier than theirs. Then one can look at things like sales, expense and income, how well the product might sell or is selling, or how well it competes or might compete with all the other "healthy" filtered and flavored water.
Quite another thing to say that it is a treatment or "may be a key to a cure" for a serious killing disease such as HIV. Actually using it or intending to use it in that capacity shouldn't be taken lightly. That brings up a much higher level of scrutiny and a much higher level and standard of proof needed from AQLV.
Any proof needed from the questioning public is already self evident -- they are there.
FEATURED ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Launchs IQ Nano Drone for Commercial Indoor Use • Oct 10, 2024 8:09 AM
FEATURED CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Targets Alibaba as the Next Retail Giant for Wholesale Expansion of Top-Selling CBD Products • Oct 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Foremost Lithium Announces Option Agreement with Denison on 10 Uranium Projects Spanning over 330,000 Acres in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan • FAT • Oct 10, 2024 5:51 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Reports Significant Progress in Community Relations and Development Efforts in Chachas, Peru • ELEM • Oct 9, 2024 10:30 AM
Unitronix Corp Launches Share Buyback Initiative • UTRX • Oct 9, 2024 9:10 AM
BASANITE INDUSTRIES, LLC RECEIVES U.S. PATENT FOR ITS BASAFLEX™ BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE REBAR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING • BASA • Oct 9, 2024 7:30 AM