InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 41
Posts 6027
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/19/2009

Re: A deleted message

Tuesday, 10/18/2011 1:12:20 AM

Tuesday, October 18, 2011 1:12:20 AM

Post# of 30974
AQLV is the only one to prove themselves. They are the public company, taking public money or financing, based upon their making claims with their product. Proving themselves to the public that is questioning AQLV validity and those questions are the topic. The questioning public is not the ones who have to prove themselves.

The fact that the publics questions being answered sufficiently by AQLV with documented and recognized authority, and not by just the company merely stating "because we said so" or some type of "info commercial" tactics, are a intricate part of that validity.

It's one thing to have some fancy filtrated water to put with the rest of the competition, and state we believe ours is healthier than theirs. Then one can look at things like sales, expense and income, how well the product might sell or is selling, or how well it competes or might compete with all the other "healthy" filtered and flavored water.

Quite another thing to say that it is a treatment or "may be a key to a cure" for a serious killing disease such as HIV. Actually using it or intending to use it in that capacity shouldn't be taken lightly. That brings up a much higher level of scrutiny and a much higher level and standard of proof needed from AQLV.

Any proof needed from the questioning public is already self evident -- they are there.