Are you serious? How about for the benefit of their shareholders or to clear their name?
You are suggesting they are innocent until proven guilty. If they were/are truly innocent, why would they risk being sued by Starr (as well as the shareholder suits which are sure to follow) along with having to absorb the expense of "defending" themselves?
They could have avoided a lot of this mess, including delisting, had they been more proactive in their own defense IMO. Instead, because they have chosen to keep quiet, they are guilty until proven innocent - this perception among investors is built into the stock price.
The burden of proof is on CCME........to suggest otherwise is a fantasy (again IMO).
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.