Winning Brands Corporation (WNBD)

[ActivClient]

Mar 16 Shareholder Question: Current Situation

The bottom line is that the attainment of one or more of the 3 principal large retailers with whom we have earned a place on their short list for approval to be carried in their stores would be so significant in its positive impact, that our current challenges would disappear substantially. This is simply because the scale of operating in those account(s) would profoundly alter our platform from being a brand that aspires to be a household name, to a brand that has the practical means to be that, coast to coast.

The unvarnished truth is that this is what it will take for the share price to increase substantially. The risk that we are all taking as investors, myself included, rests on this question. What large U.S. accounts will we be able to gain that put us within reach of consumers coast-to-coast for a nationally coordinated presence?

http://winningbrandscorporation.com/blog/2011/03/16/shareholder-question-current-situation/

May 23 Shareholder Question: Share Price

The current share price is very low because there is skepticism by the market about whether a substantially higher market cap is justified, perhaps even doubting whether the company can really make it to the next level of product acceptance in the USA, and not only survive, but thrive. The “market” is waiting for a national account.
This is important to the market because sales revenue that would come from deployment of the product in the thousands of U.S. paint departments that major home improvement banners represent (not to mention other types of banners) would provide Winning Brands’ working capital, rather than the capital markets providing that working capital. This massive deployment can be achieved with just one or two “majors”........
The “market” knows that merely obtaining such an account(s) is a game changer. Then when you add the impact of access to 4,000 additional independent stores that will come with the Do-it-Best activation that’s being worked on now, we will be looking at the biggest positive impact on the company’s natural cash flow in Winning Brands’ history............


As a back-up plan, we are not making ourselves dependent upon securing those majors for our long term success. Our product is going to continue to gain traction regardless.

http://winningbrandscorporation.com/blog/2011/05/23/shareholder-question-share-price/



HUH? In March he states the "unvarnished truth" is that WE NEED AN NA for the pps to move....

But then in May he states we are not putting all our eggs in one basket cause we can go on without an NA????

So Eric...What is really the truth?

Definition of "Unvarnished"

1. Not coated with varnish
2. Stated or otherwise presented without any effort to soften or disguise

http://www.answers.com/topic/unvarnished

So he was telling us..."no bull bagholders...we need an NA for you to get your money back"...then backtracks two months later and states...."Nahhhh...we can do it without em"....That makes me think he knew the response from either one or two NA's back in May vice July when he informed of us both NA decisions.....on the SAME DAY...lol...yea...it's a coincidence both happened to call him the same day right? That response must of been part of a defense mechanism; Eric telling himself he doesn't need an NA...His company can thrive with the world's best stain remover selling at just gas stations and candy stores...after one or both already had told him no...lol

http://winningbrandscorporation.com/blog/2011/07/12/straight-talk-u-s-retail-banners-status/