InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 148
Posts 3313
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/19/2007

Re: Anvil post# 9710

Thursday, 10/13/2011 5:50:44 PM

Thursday, October 13, 2011 5:50:44 PM

Post# of 23971
res ipsa loquitor

while one ceo led others to believe filings werent forthcoming for reasons a, b, or c.......under different circumstances those reasons are moot

now, without a buffer between nhs/jeff and mineseeker, since both nhs/jeff and minesseeker claim or agree there was no agreement bw nhs and ms;

is jd who is still claiming and filing to be ceo of qasp a party to interference of a contractual or business relationship bw qasp and ms,

or is breach of fidcuicary duty more appropriate

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.