res ipsa loquitor while one ceo led others to believe filings werent forthcoming for reasons a, b, or c.......under different circumstances those reasons are moot now, without a buffer between nhs/jeff and mineseeker, since both nhs/jeff and minesseeker claim or agree there was no agreement bw nhs and ms; is jd who is still claiming and filing to be ceo of qasp a party to interference of a contractual or business relationship bw qasp and ms, or is breach of fidcuicary duty more appropriate