InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 4070
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/03/2007

Re: Kung Pao Chicken post# 101473

Wednesday, 10/12/2011 6:29:59 PM

Wednesday, October 12, 2011 6:29:59 PM

Post# of 103340

Apparently no one wants to admit they have no evidence if the principals sold or not, so deflecting seems to be the order of the day.


Explain the obvious differences in the known floats and trading disparities leading up to and following P&Ds in 2008 and 2009 that just happened to nearly match the number of shares supposedly "never sold" by Brown and Harrs. If you can't explain it factually with irrefutable evidence as to what caused the documented disparities both times, then it's circumstantial evidence they sold all their shares until you can. So, in lieu of doing anything at all to add the slightest plausibility to your "argument", would you like to go with the "unseen, undefined, unproven, unexplained clandestine secret entities" theory, the MM manipulation that would have cost them several million dollars to set up, execute and cover up and maybe netted them $50K theory or you going to stick with the "I got absolutely no clue but you're definitely wrong" line of "logic"? IMHO.



Pojama people, pojama people people...Lord they make you sleepy with the things they might say...