InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 1670
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/03/2004

Re: Bobwins post# 14782

Sunday, 06/26/2005 12:38:06 PM

Sunday, June 26, 2005 12:38:06 PM

Post# of 173813
Bobwins: Yes, I know for sure that is a reason to bypass form 10. I am not sure that they would have done a form 10 and had it rejected. Seems like a good SEC attorney would know upfront if they could pass or fail. I know someone who just did a similar deal with a BB company for the reasons stated. Form 10 would be much cheaper with no dilution. Can't think of another logical reason to go reverse shell route.

I will check and see if having a form 10 rejected would impact the merger. I tend to doubt it. Many people looking to do a reverse deal are initially attracted to the OTCBB shells and when they see the cost involved and disclosures, they opt for the Pink Sheeters instead.

For paper filings, you could actually go to the main office and get a copy. I don't know if form 10 is included in that. Since NWAU is not an Edgar filer, we can't see anything online. Search SEC sight for contact number, as I think you could call them regarding this.

http://sec.gov/about/forms/form10.pdf

Signatures are so yesterday!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.