InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 4220
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2003

Re: mknuds post# 102150

Sunday, 10/09/2011 10:30:30 AM

Sunday, October 09, 2011 10:30:30 AM

Post# of 118239
Come on, you are too smart to buy into that fallacy.

Or maybe, he didn't sell that many. Fuel for thought.



The SEC made the unambiguous claim in their complaint that Gendarme purchased and sold at least 2.1 billion shares of RCCH stock. No matter how Vernon (in his various aliases) tries to spin that fact, it is the foundation of the SEC complaint against Gendarme. It is impossible to obtain false unrestricted share certificates from the transfer agent without obtaining the shares legitimately first. If Gendarme had NOT bought that many shares (regardless of how many they eventually sold) they could have the entire complaint thrown out on that single technicality. In their response they would only have to say they didn't buy that many shares from RCCH and if the SEC couldn't prove they did the case would collapse.

The complaint is quite specifically about the way that Gendarme convinced the transfer agent to release those shares without restrictions. The number of shares purchased is not contested by either side. It is a fact.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.