InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,731.86
(
0.46%
)
US TECH 100
19,512.00
(
0.82%
)
Dow Jones
42,039.29
(
0.66%
)
Brent Oil
73.03
(
-1.33%
)
Bitcoin
69,044.25
(
-1.65%
)
Post# of 203990
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

panim

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 31
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/20/2011

panim

Re: semipro post# 203352

Saturday, 10/08/2011 8:17:18 PM

Saturday, October 08, 2011 8:17:18 PM

Post# of 203990
Company must have sent a letter to sec to have the Q removed and become compliant again, no other way the Q would have come off.Sec doesn't just remove the Q if the company wasn't speaking with the regulators. We all know Swift bought all the assets, who's to say Swift has not made a deal to start up production again.
Since Xkem is listed on the OTC it does'nt have to inform the shareholders, removing the Q is a big deal
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up