Home > Boards > US OTC > Delisted > Pharm Control Ltd. (fka PMCL)

No buy / No sell according to Scottrade.

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
PhillyPA65 Member Profile
 
Followed By 12
Posts 1,925
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/14/06
160x600 placeholder
PhillyPA65   Thursday, 10/06/11 06:48:50 PM
Re: slob post# 39743
Post # of 39795 
No buy / No sell according to Scottrade. Use it as a long term capital loss on your taxes one year. I believe Scottrade charges $25 to remove these kind of shares from an account. There is no company behind the shares. I'll have to check the SEC site to see if there are any updates in the case against Boock, Defreitas, Loisel, Wong, Shoss

SEC v. Boock, Defreitas, Loisel, Wong, Shoss

Civil Docket for Case No: 1:09-CV-08261-DLC-DCF

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2009/comp21243.pdf

02/01/2011 79 AFFIRMATION of Irwin Boock in Opposition re: 78 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Irwin Boock's Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default. Document filed by Irwin Boock. (mbe) (Entered: 02/03/2011)

01/25/2011 78 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Irwin Boock's Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Boock Transcr. Excerpts)(Chretien, Justin) (Entered: 01/25/2011)

01/18/2011 77 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Edward Robert Averbuch on behalf of Jason C. Wong (Averbuch, Edward) (Entered: 01/18/2011)

01/13/2011 76 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Denise L. Cote from Justin Chretien dated 1/10/11 re: counsel for plaintiff writes regarding rescheduling defendant's deposition of the Commission's expert, James Cangiano, from January 18, 2011, to February 4, 2011, which would mean the deposition would take place after the close of discovery on January 21, 2011. ENDORSEMENT: Granted. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 1/12/11) (pl) Modified on 1/14/2011 (ae). (Entered: 01/13/2011)

01/10/2011 75 MOTION to Supplement Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Concerning Damages with Newly Discovered Evidence re: 74 Notice (Other) of Motion to Supplement. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit DOJ Letter, # 2 Exhibit DeFreitas Depo Excerpts pt I, # 3 Exhibit DeFreitas Depo Excerpts pt II, # 4 Exhibit DeFreitas Depo Excerpts pt III)(Chretien, Justin) (Entered: 01/10/2011)

01/10/2011 74 NOTICE of filing Motion to Supplement Proposed Findings with New Evidence re: 52 Post Trial Memorandum,, 51 Post Trial Memorandum. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Chretien, Justin) (Entered: 01/10/2011)

12/22/2010 73 NOTICE of of Intent to File Supplemental Declarations. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Chretien, Justin) (Entered: 12/22/2010)

12/14/2010 72 MOTION for Protective Order. Document filed by Irwin Boock.(mbe) (Entered: 12/16/2010)

12/14/2010 71 ORDER, that Boock's motion is denied. The December 16 deposition of DeFreitas may go forward as scheduled. The SEC is not prohibited from asking questions regarding Boock or Birte Boock. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 12/14/10) Copies Sent By Chambers. (pl) (Entered: 12/14/2010)

11/12/2010 70 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of affirmation in Opposition to Motion served on Justin Chretien, Stanton Defreitas, Jason Wong, Roger Shoss, Nicolette Loisel, Irwin Boock on 11/11/2010. Service was made by UPS overnight express. Document filed by Irwin Boock. (mbe) (Entered: 11/16/2010)

11/12/2010 68 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Reply in Opposition to Motion served on Justin Chretien, Stanton Defreitas, Jason Wong, Roger Shoss, Nicolette Loisel, Irwin Boock on 11/8/2010. Service was made by UPS overnight express. Document filed by Birte Boock. (mbe) (Entered: 11/16/2010)

11/10/2010 69 AFFIRMATION of Irwin Boock in Opposition to Motion. Document filed by Irwin Boock. (mbe) (Entered: 11/16/2010)

11/10/2010 67 AFFIRMATION of Birte Boock in Opposition to Motion dated November 3, 2010. Document filed by Birte Boock. (mbe) (Entered: 11/16/2010)

11/08/2010 66 OPPOSITION BRIEF re: 64 Affirmation in Opposition (i.e., Opposition to Def's Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default). Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit re recently obtained mortgage for $300,000)(Chretien, Justin) (Entered: 11/08/2010)

11/08/2010 65 OPPOSITION BRIEF re: 63 Affirmation in Opposition (i.e., Opposition to Def's Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default). Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit re: recent mortgage obtained)(Chretien, Justin) (Entered: 11/08/2010)

11/05/2010 62 ORDER: Defendants Irwin Boock and Birte Boock ("the Boocks") having submitted affirmations dated October 15, 2010 in opposition to the entry of default against them, but having failed to submit proof of service of their papers on all parties to this action, including all defendants, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Boocks shall serve their October 15, 2010 affirmations on all defendants, and file proof of service with the Court, no later than November 15, 2010. 2. The Court's Pro Se Office is directed to accepted the Boocks' October 15, 2010 affirmations for filing. (See Dkts. 61 , 62 .) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 11/4/2010) Copies Sent By Chambers. (lnl) (Entered: 11/05/2010)

10/20/2010 64 AFFIRMATION of Birte Boock in Opposition to Motion dated February 25, 2010. Document filed by Birte Boock. (mbe) (Entered: 11/08/2010)

10/20/2010 63 AFFIRMATION of Irwin Boock in Opposition to Motion for Entry of Default Judgment. Document filed by Irwin Boock. (mro) (Entered: 11/08/2010)

10/05/2010 59 NOTICE of Plaintiff's Second Supplemental Declaration in Support of Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Concerning Damages re: 52 Post Trial Memorandum,, 51 Post Trial Memorandum. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Chretien, Justin) (Entered: 10/05/2010)

10/04/2010 LETTERS ROGATORY ISSUED as to Attorney General, St. Vincent & the Grenadin in West Indies. (ml) (Entered: 10/04/2010)

10/04/2010 58 ORDER finding as moot 54 Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory; finding as moot 56 Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory. ORDERED that the SEC's request to take a total of fifteen depositions is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that fact discovery must be completed by January 21, 2010. The remainder of the dates in the February 2, 2010 Scheduling Order remain the same. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions dated September 7, 2010 and September 22, 2010 for the issuance of letters rogatory shall be terminated as moot. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 10/4/2010) (jmi) (Entered: 10/04/2010)

09/30/2010 57 ORDER: 1. No later than one week from the date of this Order, plaintiff is directed to serve and file a further supplemental declaration to the Declaration of Justin Chretien, dated June 21, 2010, setting out the exhibit numbers of any of the documents referred to therein. 2. No later than three weeks from the date of this Order, defendants Irwin Boock and Birte Boock are directed to clarify whether they are seeking to set aside the default entered against them, or are only seeking to challenge the damages sought by Plaintiff. Defendants are cautioned that, if they wish to appear in this proceeding pro se (in other words, to appear on their own behalf, without counsel), they must each appear separately; Mr. Boock cannot speak for, or represent, Ms. Boock before this Court, as he is not an attorney authorized to appear before the Court as counsel. Accordingly, defendants are cautioned that, if Ms. Boock does not appear on her own behalf or through an attorney, the Court will not treat her as having made an appearance. 3. If defendants wish to move to set aside the default against them, their further submissions should include specific factual showings to support their position that they have meritorious defenses to this action. Any such showing should be made through evidence inadmissible form, meaning that any statements by defendants should be presented in either sworn affidavits or declarations expressly made under penalty of perjury. Copies of any documentary evidence that defendants wish to submit to support their position should be attached as exhibits to such affidavits or declarations. Defendants should also present any other facts that may be pertinent to the question of whether the defaults against them should be set aside, including, for example, facts regarding the circumstances of their initial decisions not to defend this action. 4. If defendants simply wish to challenge plaintiffs claimed damages, then defendants should set forth the basis of any such challenge, again through affidavits or declarations madeunder penalty of perjury. If defendants seek an in-person, evidentiary hearing with respect to damages, then, as set forth in this Court's earlier Scheduling Order, they should specifically request such a hearing. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 9/30/10) Copies Sent By Chambers. (db) (Entered: 09/30/2010)

09/22/2010 56 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory to Attorney General St. Vincent & the Grenadines. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Application for Letter Rogatory to Attorney General, St. Vincent & the Grenadines, # 2 Proposed Letter Rogatory)(Chretien, Justin) (Entered: 09/22/2010)

09/10/2010 55 NOTICE of Supplemental Declaration in Support of Post Trial Memorandum re: 52 Post Trial Memorandum,,. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Chretien, Justin) (Entered: 09/10/2010)

09/07/2010 54 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory Notice of Application. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Application for Letter of Request, # 2 Text of Proposed Order Letter of Request)(Chretien, Justin) (Entered: 09/07/2010)

07/21/2010 53 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Concerning Damages served on Irwin Boock, Stanton DeFreitas, Birte Boock, and Ontario 1621566 on June 22, 2010. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Chretien, Justin) (Entered: 07/21/2010)

06/21/2010 52 POST TRIAL MEMORANDUM. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 4 part 2, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 4 part 3, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 4 part 4, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 part 5, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 4 part 6, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 4 part 7, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 5, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit 6, 7, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit Exhibits 11, 12, 13, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit 14, # 14 Affidavit Gallacher affidavit, # 15 Affidavit Amyot declaration)(Chretien, Justin) (Entered: 06/21/2010)

06/21/2010 51 POST TRIAL MEMORANDUM. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Justin Chretien, # 2 Exhibit Exhibits 1, 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit Exhibi t pt II)(Chretien, Justin) (Entered: 06/21/2010)

06/15/2010 50 OPINION AND ORDER #99056 re: 18 MOTION to Dismiss, MOTION to Quash filed by Nicolette D. Loisel. Loisel's 1/27 motion to dismiss is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 6/15/2010) (tve) Modified on 6/17/2010 (ajc). (Entered: 06/15/2010)

06/15/2010 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #99055 re: 47 MOTION to Stay filed by Nicolette D. Loisel. The March 19 and May 10 motions by defendants Shoss and Loisel to stay this action as to them pending the resolution of the criminal proceedings against them, are granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 6/15/2010) (tve) Modified on 6/17/2010 (ajc). (Entered: 06/15/2010)

05/13/2010 48 LETTER addressed to Judge Denise L. Cote from Roger L. Shoss dated 4/19/10 re: This letter will serve as my response to the SEC's opposition to my request for a stay in this proceeding. Document filed by Roger L. Shoss.(mro) (Entered: 05/18/2010)

05/11/2010 46 ORDER, that on April 29, 2010, the Court rejected for filing a motion by pro se defendant Nicolette Loisel to stay the proceedings because the defendant had not served all counsel. On May 10, 2010, Loisel re-filed the motion and served all counsel. Also on May 10, the plaintiff filed opposition papers to Loisel's motion. It is hereby ORDERED that a reply, if any, is due by May 28, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that failure to comply with any of the terms of this Order may constitute grounds for the denial of requested relief, dismissal of the action, the entry of judgment by default, or such other action as may be just in the circumstances. Additional relief as set forth in this Order. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 5/11/10) Copies mailed by Chambers.(pl) (Entered: 05/11/2010)

05/10/2010 47 MOTION to Stay the proceedings. Document filed by Nicolette D. Loisel.(mbe) (Entered: 05/12/2010)

05/10/2010 45 RESPONSE re: 42 Order,,, Response to Pro Se Motion for Stay. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Chretien, Justin) (Entered: 05/10/2010)

05/06/2010 44 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Debra Freeman from Justin Chretien dated 5/5/2010 re: Requesting a 30 day extension time in which to file its proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning damages in the above case, referred to your Honor by Judge Denise Cote for the purposes of an inquest. ENDORSEMENT: The within requested extension is granted. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 5/5/2010) (jpo) (Entered: 05/06/2010)

05/04/2010 43 LETTER addressed to Judge Denise L. Cote from John J. Dempsey dated 4/29/2010 re: Counsel write to correct an inadvertent misstatement of fact in plaintiff S.E.C.'s Opposition to defendant Roger L. Shoss's Request for a Stay in this action filed with he Court on 4/9/2010. Specifically, the staff erroneously stated in its Opposition that none of the issuers subject to its complaint were subject to the criminal proceedings brought by the US Attorney in the Middle District of Florida. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission.(tro) (Entered: 05/06/2010)

04/29/2010 42 ORDER; that having received notice from the Court's Pro Se Office of a motion by defendant Loisel that was not served upon all counsel, it is hereby ORDERED that any time any party files a motion or any papers with the Court, that the party also serve all parties and counsel listed on the attached mailing sheet. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that when filing any papers with the Court, the parties shall provide a courtesy copy to Chambers by sending them to this Court's Pro Se Office, Room 230, United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that failure to comply with any of the terms of this Order may constitute grounds for the denial of requested relief, dismissal of the action, the entry of judgment by default, or such other action as may be just in the circumstances. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 4/29/10) Copies mailed by Chambers.(pl) (Entered: 04/30/2010)

04/23/2010 41 MEMO ENDORSED denying 39 Motion for Extension of Time. Under SDNY L.Civ R.37.2, no discovery dispute may be raised any motion without a request for a conference preceding it. Moreover, the parties must attempt to resolve any dispute through a meet and confer process before raising it with the Court. Motion is denied. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 4/23/2010) (jmi) Modified on 5/3/2010 (jmi). (Entered: 04/26/2010)

04/21/2010 40 SCHEDULING ORDER FOR DAMAGES INQUEST: Plaintiff shall file and serve on defendants Irwin Boock, Stanton BJ. DeFreitas, Birte Boock, and 1621566 Ontario, Inc. (with a courtesy copy to my chambers) Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law concerning damages no later than May 21, 2010. Plaintiff shall include with such service a copy of this Order. Defendants Irwin Boock, Stanton B.1. DeFreitas, Birte Boock, and 1621566 Ontario, Inc. shall submit their responses, if any, to Plaintiff's submission no later than JUNE 21, 2010. IF DEFENDANTS (I) FAIL TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S SUBMISSIONS, OR (2) FAIL TO CONTACT MY CHAMBERS IN WRITING BY JUNE 21, 2010, TO REQUEST AN IN-COURT HEARING, IT IS MY INTENTION TO ISSUE A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING DAMAGES ON THE BASIS OF PLAINTIFF'S WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ALONE WITHOUT AN IN-COURT HEARING. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 4/21/2010) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(jpo) Modified on 4/21/2010 (jpo). (Entered: 04/21/2010)

04/16/2010 39 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission's First Set of Document Requests and Interrogatories. Document filed by Jason C. Wong. Return Date set for 4/26/2010 at 12:00 AM. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Weigel, Russell) (Entered: 04/16/2010)

04/09/2010 38 OPPOSITION BRIEF re: 33 Letter, requesting stay. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission.(Kisslinger, Paul) (Entered: 04/09/2010)

04/01/2010 37 MEMO ENDORSED granting 36 Motion for John J. Dempsey to Appear Pro Hac Vice for the Securities and Exchange Commission. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 4/1/10) (cd) (Entered: 04/01/2010)

Defendant Irwin Boock
Defendant Stanton B.J. Defreitas
Defendant Nicolette D. Loisel
Defendant Roger L. Shoss
Defendant Jason C. Wong
Relief Defendant Birte Boock
Relief Defendant 1621566 Ontario, Inc. a Corporation

Sell Into The Pump - Don't Get Stuck In The Dump
Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist