InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 71
Posts 17655
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/29/2008

Re: ChannelTrader post# 38893

Monday, 10/03/2011 6:29:36 PM

Monday, October 03, 2011 6:29:36 PM

Post# of 41474
Proof - no shorting and no naked shorting. This has now been confirmed.

Re: adanac post

No Short , No Naked Short either...and here's whey your numbers aren't important:

So, if the SEC says there are no FTDs on pyct AND you can't have Naked Shorting without FTDs...your theory is shot.... done....major Fail. Here is where you can check yourself for any sign of FTDs:
http://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/failsdata.htm

http://failurestodeliver.com/default2.aspx
Just keep in mind you have to have FTDs if you claim you have NSS.
Since the numbers your trying to portray as short or Naked shorting and you have ZERO proof, but others here have already shown that there is just no interest in a scam stock that already admits to dumping shares...there is where all your mystery volume is coming from.

Anyway - it makes perfect sense that pyct is the only one to blame for the poor position it is in....poorly trained shills that don't know how the market works, greedy management that can't stop dumping shares, and the best of all- zero product after all the years of claims otherwise.


Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.