Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[mitoo]

nice. these are the parts that interest me:

19. The process of claim 12 wherein the thin stillage stream is conducted to an evaporator to produce a syrup stream containing less than about 15 wt. % water, which syrup stream is itself conducted to an oil removal stage wherein at least of the oil is removed from the syrup.

20. The process of claim 19 wherein the oil is removed from the syrup by centrifugation to produce a mixture of oil and water stream.


which i think the court wrongly expanded to this:

19. The process of claim 12 wherein the thin stillage stream is conducted to an evaporator to produce a [concentrate] stream [ ], which [concentrate] stream is itself conducted to an oil removal stage wherein at least of the oil is removed from the [concentrate].

20. The process of claim 19 wherein the oil is removed from the [concentrate] by centrifugation to produce a mixture of oil and water stream.


because: seems a clear distinction between the lightly concentrated thin stillage intercepted by the company during the evaporation process (insert-text-here) and the syrup described in prevost, and the court identified absolutely nothing to indicate anyone skilled in the art [blurred] that distinction prior to ... 858. isnt the evidence to the contrary?

moo