JE seemed careful enough in providing direct quotes from statements of record. For example:
Bart has the following choices:
Be prepared to prove the quote never existed, and JE has fabricated it out of thin air.
or
Be prepared to prove the Ellicottville Planning Board was slandering his business reputation, and demand a retraction from then, and then a subsequent deletion from the NH submission.
Then again city boards have their own lawyers review such findings before being issued. And the dust has long settled on it.
Neither does it take $10s of thousands to have a lawyer write a letter demanding a retraction for false statements, and threatening a follow up lawsuit if it isn't done.
Why would a Bart allow this history go unchallenged, reflecting on his reputation for years to come? Only one answer - it's accurate, and can not be challenged.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.