Ole Vern: Yeah we got trouble right here here in River City! Unfortunately our most active vounteers on the fire department feel multiple buckets of kerosene and ofal make for a pretty fire. Perhaps they believe the Big Lie told often enough etc.
A lot of us invested in DNAP for the science concept that still hasn't been destroyed by the bash brigade. We've seen setbacks, but we've also seen accomplishments. More will be learned today when the executives have to put up. I think few investors here are happy with monetary gains DNAP has achieved. Defecit Spending, and now dilution on the horizon make for rising tensions and despair. You've been around a long time and have watched DNAP for many years. I've been in DNAP a while too. When I get down on myself or feel bad with the constant bashing, I look at my original DD and try to look at things in the light of "why I got in" in the first place. I can't say the investment has gone well as an investment to this time. And it doesn't look all roses and orchids going into the future. But I have faith in Doctor Frudakis and feel the growing pains will abate. The gestation period isn't over, and so I look at my past reasons for investing and I continue on to term. The scalawags who "burn the wires" with negativity are doing so for a commercial interest. I find it hard to believe that so much effort is put to such an "unworthy" target as DNAP. Perhaps more telling is the vitriol sphewed by the ones who contend they are invested! Such humanists are they, that they lambaste the vehicle that could reward them financially. Unless of course they seek financial reward from destruction rather than sucess.
I expect much information to come forth from the shareholder meeting. A restatement of DNAPS goals, perhaps even a midcourse correction beyond what we've seen. I hope a vocal componenet of the attendees will hold feet to the fire, and not accept witticism like "Orchid will crash in 6 months". We have made an investment in DNAP. Not a contribution. Market forces have hindered our advancement, blind alley missteps, and the recent rejection of a submitted patent application is alas dishearening. It slows the process and more costly time must be expended to resubmit.
Heres to all us longs, we've supported DNAP when it was looking good, and now we have to choose to let our support flag in troubled times or believe in our original conviction and investment.
Stakddek
