Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:15:09 PM
Another thought I've had is in relation to why when they did the RS did they specify that no shareholders would receive less than 100 shares, even with split. No logical reason for it, unless, it had to do with keeping the number of shareholders the same. The only logical reason I can think for that, is to perhaps satisfy some uplist qualifications or that they love investors :) Most likely not the latter. If others have theories would love to hear them. Either way, heavy speculation of course, but with that sale, watching closely now. Signs do point to RM atm...
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM