RCC Holdings Corp fka RCCH

[frogdreaming]

Interesting example of selective logic.

You argue that even though there is a (allegedly) huge supply of RCCH shares, a very small demand (as forced by the lack of participating brokers) causes excessive fluctuations in the share price.

I wonder why you don't consider the FACT that the vast majority of those 10 billion shares reside in accounts at the non-participating brokers, thereby severely restricting the virtual float and increasing the volatility proportionally.

If you want to apply logic to an argument, you must do it across the board, not in a selective manner that supports your preconceived conclusion.

“And ... the SEC has already proven that Gene sold out the shareholders by selling shares at $0.00005 to $0.00007 to Gendarme……..”

jmo in small letters at the end of that post excuses all the misrepresentations I guess.

"Proven" is correct. The conclusion is inescapable.

The SEC complaint lays out the scenario, the accused response makes no attempt to refute it. Case closed.

If Gendarme didn't buy those shares at discounted prices they would have used that fact to blow away the SEC complaint. They didn't.