InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1455
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/29/2011

Re: PLUTUS post# 81100

Friday, 09/16/2011 4:30:11 PM

Friday, September 16, 2011 4:30:11 PM

Post# of 155527
jkm - I wish it were that easy; but if it were we wouldn't need judges or lawyers. There is email correspondence which in this day and age can be considered a contract depending on the circumstances. There is also the issue of money provided from Plaintiffs to Defendants.

In terms of planning from the beginning - one never really knows what people plan. Good planning can take years to develop and maybe we have that here.

I agree - there are a lot of people looking for something for nothing. Again you are correct they were convicted of it. I personally feel that anyone that scams another individual or multiple individuals should be fully prosecuted and have to repay every dime!

That is an interesting comment - did not do the deal...but in the email correspondence he did ask for the money. So if he asked for the money that can be constituted as accepting the terms of the agreement. Don't take this the wrong way - I hope that is not the way this case goes.

Everything I post is my opinion nothing more.