Strategic Asset Leasing Inc (LEAS)

[Chroma-Z]

According to the court documents the Dismissal and Default Claims were to be discussed on 15 September. Since this case is continuing forward it clearly indicates there was not cause for dismissal (which adds some legitimacy for the Plaintiffs) and there was not cause for a Default Claim (which adds some legitimacy for the Defendants).

On several occasions it was stated the suit would be dismissed. Here are just a few times that still exist:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbymember.aspx?searchID=200681&srchyr=2011&SearchStr=dismissed

There are others that have stated the same thing; however, that is not the case.

I certainly agree that people sue others for doing nothing wrong and get a settlement. It is unfortunate and that is the world we live in. WE have created a system that caters to the inept and have reinforced that common sense is no longer needed - fact is the less common sense we have the more we can be rewarded for it.

IMO the lawsuit should be settled out of court and should have never went this far to begin with. I believe this suit should have been settled months ago but instead it was ignored and discounted! I also believe the Plaintiffs will at least receive their initial investment of $40,000.