Monday, September 12, 2011 10:07:28 PM
I can understand your point of view of giving the Plaintiff ammunition; however, there are 2 points that I find it difficult to get past:
1) Certified information that Liebs and MMTE were served on July 19 but on August 21 released information they were not served and knew of no pending litigation.
2) If this suit is of no concern why did they not attend the pre trial hearing? So not only did MMTE state they knew nothing about it they took it one step further and did not attend the pretrial.
ILUS Provides an Update on the Binding Term Sheet Signed with Actelis Networks (NASDAQ: ASNS) • ILUS • May 31, 2024 12:52 PM
Element79 Gold To Provide Summary and Update on Active Exploration Program, Community Relations at RMEC on June 4 • ELEM • May 30, 2024 1:18 PM
Branded Legacy Secures Exclusive Extraction Partnership with One of the World's Largest Kava Distributors and Producers • BLEG • May 30, 2024 8:30 AM
ECGI Holdings, Inc. Announces $2 Million Debt-to-Equity Conversion • ECGI • May 30, 2024 8:30 AM
North Bay Resources Reports Assays up to >25% Mg, 0.1% Ni, 0.1% Cu, 0.01% Co, 0.3 ppm Pt at Tulameen Platinum Project, British Columbia • NBRI • May 29, 2024 9:03 AM
One World Products, Inc. Issues Shareholder Update • OWPC • May 29, 2024 8:20 AM