InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 1054
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/03/2005

Re: None

Thursday, 06/16/2005 6:37:33 PM

Thursday, June 16, 2005 6:37:33 PM

Post# of 30387
headache...as far as time frame until we get some sort of independant verification, I don't think we'll see conclusive data out of Abbott or whoever for 6 - 12 months. Everyone I'm talking to is telling me that the process for testing a serum assay for general screening indication is ULTRA fast.
We're talking about simply issuing a positive or negative reading for each sample out of a large group of samples, and determining the sensitivity/specificity.

The specifics of trial design -- like how many arms and what arms -- will be up to Abbott, & will largely depend on how they want to position RECAF in the market. In light of what I said in my prior post about positioning RECAF as a "piggyback" assay at first, I wouldn't be surprised if they structured a dual-arm trial of PSA test vs. RECAF plus PSA. That data would give their marketing/distribution machine a ton of leverage compared to just a PSA vs. RECAF test.



DISCLAIMER: NEVER ASSUME INFO ON MESSAGE BOARDS TO BE ACCURATE. ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN DUE DILIGENCE. DON'T BUY STOCK BASED ON THIS POST OR ANY OTHER POST. I OWN A LONG POSITION IN THIS STOCK AND THEREFORE I AM BIASED.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.