My apologies, I now understand your position. You have stated more than once that 'sole subsidiary' means the same as 'sole' owner'. Since most of us know that a subsidiary and an owner are two distinct and separate entities it stands to reason that there is room for confusion on this point. Obviously in normal usage the terms are not interchangeable. However, given your obvious intimate familiarity with RCCH and the the known fact that all of the recent acquisitions are merely inventions of the owner it is an arguable premise that the 'owner' and the 'subsidiary' are the exact same entity. Making your argument, if not correct, at least understandable. LOL
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.