InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 168
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/19/2011

Re: janeyH post# 27532

Wednesday, 09/07/2011 12:50:29 PM

Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:50:29 PM

Post# of 113927
ya, thats a fair point.. and in that scenario, yes 2billion shares would be more profitable than 200m IF they were both at .001.. but, thats where i think your argument has a flaw- the pps has been at nearly .02 recently, is currently around .006, and could easily be at .01 with a pr pump.. so in that case, 200m shares at .01 is worth the same as 2b shares at .001(if my math is correct) and it would be easier to unload them at .01 than .001 after having just diluted their shares.. furthermore, those shares would be worth much more at .02 or higher which is attainable with some pumping from the company if they were so inclined.. if they "diluted" shares to the tune of 2.5 billion, with the intent to unload for profit, in your example, they would never see those kinds of pps.. they would be lucky to get .002- my point being there must be some other more legitimate reason for them to increase A/S.. if it was only to sell for profit, why wouldn't they have sold when it was near .02? or even .40 like a couple years ago? this is just the way i'm looking at it, but you don't see it this way, i know..