Tuesday, September 06, 2011 6:29:00 AM
However, your post was misleading asking how Luv can deny the reviews of actual people who tried the product.
My point, no matter how she arrived at her review of the product, it was not from actually trying the product because she went along with one review that differed from several others probably to support her pre-existing belief that the product was "...just another digital that didn't work..."
I was one of those reviewers to whom she is referring. I gave a positive review because it represented my experience of the product. I don't usually shop Amazon unless I am buying books which I don't review.
How is my review a less accurate review of the product just because that's my only review?
That doesn't make sense to me. My experience of the product was represented in my review... which is the purpose of the review.
CW
North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 5 oz/ton Gold, 1.5 oz/ton Platinum, 0.5 oz/ton Palladium, and 0.5 oz/ton Rhodium at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Oct 4, 2024 9:15 AM
Basanite, Inc. Appoints Ali Manav as Interim Chief Executive Officer • BASA • Oct 3, 2024 9:15 AM
Integrated Ventures Announces Launch of MedWell Facilities, LLC and Lease Agreement with Giant Fitness Clubs • INTV • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
Beyond the Horizon: Innovative Drug Combinations Offer New Hope for Alzheimer's and More • NVS • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service To Enhance Natural Rubber Industry's Ability to Report on Sustainable and Ethical Supply Chains • SMX • Oct 3, 2024 7:00 AM
Transforming Alzheimer's Treatment: Innovative Combinations to Boost Cognition • PFE • Oct 2, 2024 9:00 AM