InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 2099
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2007

Re: usandy post# 47759

Monday, 09/05/2011 1:04:23 PM

Monday, September 05, 2011 1:04:23 PM

Post# of 60938
Settling with T-Mobile does nothing of the sort. Beating T-Mobile in court sets up precedence. And the amount of the settlement matters. It will be the most important thing in dealing with every other company SINCE a settlement sets no legally enforceable precedence. A settlement of less than $50 million with our biggest, longest infringer who has deep pockets and is able to pay means that we will roll over for pennies on the dollar if you use our patent, particularly if you are a smaller company. The only precedence it sets is how little we are willing to take.

It is folly to believe that a quick, cheap settlement with T-Mobile puts us in a better situation for the future. Especially considering that we do not have to invest another dime to get a larger settlement. I would venture to say that there are plenty of contingency lawyers willing to take this case. All it requires is patience and prudence.

Further, it is going to take time to get us off the grays. A quick settlement does not benefit the shareholder since the stock is not in a position to benefit from the PR. Many people and many brokers will not touch it.

Lets take some time and do this right, as it may be our ONLY chance to get it right. Lets have a plan that benefits the shareholders.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.