InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 400
Posts 48611
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/20/2011

Re: Teedlum post# 100743

Sunday, 09/04/2011 6:18:53 PM

Sunday, September 04, 2011 6:18:53 PM

Post# of 103302
I think holding that money tight to prove to the SEC they have successfully completed a project as advertised would be the prudent thing to do

The SEC could not give a rip about the operations of Laidlaw Energy. They only care about the publicly traded security LLEG. Whether a project is completed or not is also irrelevant. Similarly, compensation or dividend amounts are irrelevant as long as they are properly accounted for and reported as required. Yes, if LLEG misrepresents something, then they are in dodo. But what does "as advertised" mean? Have they made a commitment or said something promissory that they may not be able to follow through on?

The SEC does not care what a company does business wise, what business they are in our how they pay themselves, as long as they meet the security laws as they pertain to the public security LLEG.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.