InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 2470
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/03/2010

Re: noquit post# 32419

Sunday, 09/04/2011 10:47:16 AM

Sunday, September 04, 2011 10:47:16 AM

Post# of 38585

Not for one single New York minute am I comfortable with the company saying the authorities won't let them communicate as freely anymore.

No insider info ever came out in the past from fluff PRs, so why the clam act now ?




Just to clarify...

Now I realize many of you have submitted additional questions and it is my heart-felt desire to answer those questions. However, on advice from a new securities attorney, I must discontinue such communications.



http://precisionir.api.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EdgarPro.dll?FetchFilingHTML1?SessionID=MfowFSzK0tljP6S&ID=7899292

Troy stated that he was not able to continue the Question and Answer sessions on the advice from his attorney. He never mentioned PR's or anything else....but why should he PR something if he doesn't feel it is necessary? People complain about forward looking PR's and "fluff" PR's when they happen and the complain when they don't happen!!! LOL No such thing as making everyone happy.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.