InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 586
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/08/2010

Re: Helter Skelter post# 27121

Thursday, 09/01/2011 9:20:10 PM

Thursday, September 01, 2011 9:20:10 PM

Post# of 113927
BANKSHOT why don't you reply to my questions
I have talked to the salesperson for your BARDOT device. You are turning words around. You still have to confirm a hit on either the BARDOT device or MIT1000 device. The advantage is that 99.9 percent of the samples do not require a confirmation. I have to take that back the BARDOT is only 95% accurate according to the USDA study. For as the BARDOT is a capable of learning is false. Being a software engineer, the software can't identify a bacteria if it isn't in the database per the BARDOT salesman. Both the MIT1000 and BARDOT are both identification devices and both need confiration on a hit. So stop with the confirming device. IT IS COMMON SENSE TO CONFIRM A HIT. The saving is from not confirming each sample (99.9%). Since you are the BANKER do you see how this can save huge money.
DOGMA