InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 834
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/11/2003

Re: Not a Short post# 57496

Tuesday, 06/14/2005 8:31:05 PM

Tuesday, June 14, 2005 8:31:05 PM

Post# of 97799
More GMA900 Doom 3 performance data:

http://computershopper.com.com/4520-8902_7-5690464-1.html

When Doom 3 first came out, CNET Labs put it on a budget PC with an Intel 915 Graphics Media Accelerator 900 (GMA900) integrated graphics chip--just to see what would happen. Our tests were purely anecdotal, and it wouldn't play at a resolution higher than the minimum of 640x480



http://www20.graphics.tomshardware.com/graphic/20050208/geforce_6200-11.html

Low scores in most tests and "crash" on another. With a Very Bad/Unplayable rating in all tests (see the next page).

"and anything below 20fps is basically unplayable, as the video output is no longer fluid and will stutter noticeably."



http://graphics.tomshardware.com/graphic/20050524/vga_charts-05.html

Out of 33 GPUs tested the Intel 915G - GMA900 is the absolute slowest on any chart it shows up on. On several it couldn't even be ranked as it wouldn't run the benchmark.

and don't let Doom 3 be the only focus. You'll see it at the bottom of the chart in 3Dmark2005 and Halflife 2 as well.

http://graphics.tomshardware.com/graphic/20050524/vga_charts-02.html#3d_mark_2005



Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News