InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 4092
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/05/2010

Re: loyalty006 post# 51288

Sunday, 08/28/2011 1:32:50 AM

Sunday, August 28, 2011 1:32:50 AM

Post# of 136165
I would have posted actual sales numbers. DA based the revised numbers on something. The issues have been, while he makes these revised projections, he has not hit them for the last 3 Q's.

When a company does not hit the projection, it takes a tumble as has been the case with Bravada. That is why I would have rather had actual numbers or left well enough alone.

I would prefer Bravada be known for always beating the projections than revising them to fall short and not meet them.

He based the revision on what could have been proven but chose not to.

What ever the case, it was not great news, but a forward looking statement of DA's that has not come true in the past.