Tuesday, August 23, 2011 9:39:18 PM
The history, whether it be FINANCIALS or History the first filings have a disclaimer, BOLD TYPE AS HE SAID, that if this is strictly a shell buyout, WITH NO DEBT PURCHASE, NO FACILITY, NO EQUIPMENT, NO PRODUCT VALUATION purchase THEN NO REASON TO STILL BE INCLUDING.
HE NOTED TO ME THAT IF IT WAS REQUIRED THEN IT SHOULD SHOW MGT NAMES UNDER FINANCIALS OF PREVIOUS YEARS AS WELL AS SHELL BUYOUT, NOT READ AS IF PHAR MGT WAS IN CHARGE THIS ENTIRE TIME..BUT HE WITHOUT DOING THIS, HE never hesitated and SAID IT WAS NOT A REQUIRMENT IF THEIR FINANCIALS HAS ZERO TIES TO PAST SHELL with a ticker for ticker purchase.
I agree as far as otc companies, most havent entered market this way and will include i think 3 yr comparisons.Some that do buyouts with real property and continue or modify product, exploration or whatever in new Continuation of same business just name change will include previous financials,at least most that ive looked at with the majority unaudited, which im sure thats the norm in pinks. Thats the risk
Take care and thanks for good info.
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Welcomes Back Former CEO with Eye Toward Future Growth and Expansion • AVAI • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM