DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[worktoplay]

frog...Am I missing something, or didn't this begin here:

http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=6632503

Posted by: frogdreaming
In reply to: DorseyE who wrote msg# 27489 Date:6/10/2005 9:56:52 AM
Post #of 27633

DorseyE, WOW. That is probably the most interesting PR I have ever seen from DNAP. (I'm not kidding.)

Did anybody else notice a fairly significant omission from the text?

That is probably the first time I have ever seen a PR that did not contain it.

regards,
frog

I gave you several examples that would refute the bolded statement. Actually the examples go back for more than a year.

Bottom line is that there have been MANY PR's that don't contain a quote from Frudakis. Your argument is baseless and rediculous. And as for your attempt to redirect the conversation with this:

Posted by: frogdreaming
In reply to: worktoplay who wrote msg# 27598 Date:6/11/2005 12:43:50 PM
Post #of 27633

worktoplay, I agree.

Something has changed dramatically in the face the company presents to the public. As you have correctly pointed out, the change did not happen with this most recent PR, but had happened some months ago.

What do you think is the reason for pushing the company's founder into the background?

He used to be the spokesman for the scientific advances of the company, in essence it's technological voice. Now he seems to have faded into the background and the lesser lights (Gaskin and Shriver) are providing the technical voice, backing up Gabriel.

The company's public face seems to have undergone change. What is your interpretation of the strategy behind it?

regards,
frog

Dramatic change?...your words...NOT mine. Faded into the background?...your words...NOT mine.

So like I said before...get a grip...there's a lot going on down there, or didn't you see the pipeline page on the website.

Later,
W2P