InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 77
Posts 5771
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 04/25/2011

Re: user134247 post# 33931

Monday, 08/22/2011 6:12:43 PM

Monday, August 22, 2011 6:12:43 PM

Post# of 39254
lenders taking shares in lieu of payment most certainly says much.
it says they have a strong belief in return. what difference does it make who provided the investment capitol. you're merely barking, to hear yourself on the soap box.

Maybe you should take a better understanding of debt. according to "them" we'll get an update on what they acquired in the quarterly. anything you spout off past that is speculation at best.

the assertion that you can keep issuing shares and avoid bankruptcy is falacy conjured up by you for what reason i dont know.

Lenders are trading money for shares... not interest payments.

So let me get this straight.. 50million shares were traded for cash, and they arent even tradeable at the moment.. and you want me to believe that these guys who've invested close to a million bucks did so in an effort to lose their capitol?

the amount of shares issued is negligible, it means nothing other than it can help predict volitility.

several blue chips have BILLIONS of shares. this has 350mil maybe more or less, whateva.

and thanks for the acknowledgment. you failed perfectly prove any point. you have merely confirmed what i said, or speculated..

and yes i absolutely know how they paid for the assets, they diluted, and in the process they eliminated overhead costs. yet another smart decision.


My name aint Buffet, im just some dude..