InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 242
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/16/2011

Re: None

Thursday, 08/18/2011 3:02:19 PM

Thursday, August 18, 2011 3:02:19 PM

Post# of 52841
the boshwazee v. the pro-lataiot or mow's general horatio v. the world??? phonetically spelled of course.

i'd say theres a lot riding on the markman hearing which i understand to 1 re-consider validity and 2 fashion jury construction instructions.

suits, counter suits and legal fees can cut both ways; multiple counts can result in one or more valid, or non-valid, findings; infringments and/or non-infringment, from a single ... triall---half a can of worms!

the injunction motion, and, incidentally, its argument, was withdrawn but 858 sounds to me like a cintrufuge modification. can anyone confirm this, or otherwise distinguish povost?

on the bright side, if 239 is already in there, in all fairness, why cant its language be used for the limited purpose of interpretatioin given the seemingly legitimate rock and procedural hard palce sought to be rectified by the motion for a contiinuance?

"thou shalllt not exalt form over substance" ... least thy judge be a cs!

think i'll go fishin