Pointing out dilution, DA's ride or a stating that a forward looking PR that was not met the last time this was done, was great news, should not be addressed.
That was my whole reason for the first post yesterday. Just let the sleeping dog lie. Post the PR and leave the rest alone.
It does not make sense to me, if someone owns 3 mil shares and did not sell at and could have sold at 4, why would they want it to go lower to buy more.
What is called negative in posts to bring the stock down, is the opposite with being positive to sell. thus the reason for the PR.
If we would just stick to the facts. Let the PR stand on it's own. Like all companies that do not hit the mark, they are then downgraded and people jump out. We had a spike with the PR, but then a bigger drop.
I still continue to say, clear the estimates by a higher amount. Do not raise them or lower them. Just put it out there and if it gets beat, great.
Two scenarios--You know, this BRAV stock always puts out numbers and they almost always beat those numbers. So my guess is they will again. Then I buy more.
Then we have--You know, this company puts out numbers, then raises them to almost never hitting the increased mark. So I think I will just hold or sell into the spike of the PR.
Set the bar and clear it higher. It does not matter how high over the bar the pole vaulter goes, as long as the pole vaulter goes over it.
To be able to respond to what is thought as a negative, gives those of us the same ability to be able to respond to what is thought as someone pumping this up and making noise about something that has not happened.
I am long on Bravada and have been. Just Frustrated by promises that have not been kept and base Bravada on Facts, not forward looking statements of protection.
