<PARANOID MODE=ON>
As Aurelius partially withdrew their POR objection, I think their strategy is the following.
1.- They (SNH+debtors) expect IT charges not demonstrated. They setup an 'ethical wall BS system' so that they wouldn't trade on what they called 'material information'. I'm not going to discuss this now (actually I think they did) but SNH's will stick to 'the Plan' and claim they didn't do IT to receve a little admonishment, if any.
2.- Debtors were responsible to make the 'material info' public after the restricted trading time, which we all think they failed.
What if they (WGM/A&M) somehow avoid those responsibilities and liabilities making someone from WMI responsible for this? For example, I am sure Kousturos the 'I don't remember' clown would accept a check for being liable, and that way the whole IT issue would be settled with money from WMI's assets or Directors insurance (500$ million maximum, if I recall correctly)
I don't know, lately I am spinning my head around too much...
