InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 39
Posts 2856
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/16/2008

Re: Slojab post# 1130

Wednesday, 08/17/2011 3:54:40 PM

Wednesday, August 17, 2011 3:54:40 PM

Post# of 2478
Wow. I'm dumbfounded. You have really high standards of shareholder value.

During his tenure with ELRE, Dan took its share price from .10 to $8.80! That's a pretty nice return.... in MY book anyway.

He left his position at the peak, and the new management let everything fall apart. Imagine if he had stayed on.

So then it's an "Odds" game for you, huh? Thanks for general pinksheets advice. That kinda answers my original question. :)

I'll take those odds knowing:

1. There's been no dilution
2. Dan has taken no salary
3. Dan's proven tenacity to make ASPZ work for his investors
4. He has returned to his business roots in resources
5. Is extremely well connected in Asia, China in particular.
6. Gold is a hot market right now, and believed to continue you that way for the long term
7. Chinese investors trust Dan with their money to invest in North American resources
and, the aforementioned;
8. Integrity, Tenacity and Determination.

I'd say those are pretty goods odds for creating shareholder value despite your argument that "All Pinks are Bad".

I appreciate your objective use of the word "might" as in "So, ASPZ might be considered Dan's third failure."

A lot of things mighthappen, but given the odds, Dan's "failure" here won't be one of them.

Guess we will be finding out soon enough. Stay tuned. And thanks for sharing your thoughts.