InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 63
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/08/2005

Re: None

Wednesday, 06/08/2005 2:19:44 AM

Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:19:44 AM

Post# of 23267
Settlement with PTSC and TPL Ltd is great news, surprised that PTSC closed in the RED.

Its also good to see that patents '336, '148 & '584 show Moore and Fish as co-inventors and PTSC as the sole assignee. No mention of Moore or TPL as co-assignees (no-brainer for jurors and a slam dunk for PTSC).

However, I am concerned on how Beatie employed "Higgins in challenging Moore's co-inventorship of the patents in suit." Refer to the Court's order on 3/8/05 #190 04cv618-JF. On 3/29/05, Judge Fogel also denied PTSC's motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration - refer to #195 04cv618-JF.
If PTSC feels so strongly on admitting Higgins testimony, then why didn't PTSC's counsel appeal to the 9th Circuit? Probably was getting too expensive at that point. Does anybody know who the "Georgia Counsel" is for PTSC ?

Anyways, it looks exciting! With the recent news regarding AMD's dual-core chip and Apple's deal w/Intel, PTSC future looks bright!

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CPMV News