InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 162
Posts 12645
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 12/29/2010

Re: A deleted message

Sunday, 08/07/2011 7:34:50 AM

Sunday, August 07, 2011 7:34:50 AM

Post# of 112299
Let me try to explain that post further seeing that some people are having trouble understanding it. This is for you Max, try to follow.

The Alabama case and Bayport....

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=65924831

Bayport of Tulsa is Lou Porters company. This is the company that allegedly had the deal with Jon Ginder back in 2006 to build thorium plants, that never happened even that PR made it sound like a sure thing.

http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=103968

Now some here have a little trouble understanding certain things and cannot comprehend what is written. Max, the case I was talking about was from a company Bayport Corp. LMT, aka Bayport Indemity. They sold insurance policies to Consult America, a company which bought nursing homes in Panama City, if I remember correctly. http://dockets.justia.com/docket/alabama/alndce/5:2010cv01299/131334/

In my post we were discussing what the delay in the merger could be and Lou Porters past criminal record. Some were talking about a case in Alabama that was still open, however upon researching it further, I came to find out it was a different Bayport.

We were looking for reasons why we still have not received that PR saying the merger was complete, after all the website and Lou said it would be completed by March 31st. After that day passed, we never received any more PR's, however Lou kept telling us the papers were with Finra waiting for approval and it would happen sometime in April. Then he said the same in May.

I am not sure why Max posted that I have been caught in a lie when the post about Bayport LMT has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that Bayport Corp of Tulsa signed an agreement to help build thorium plants with North America Energy Group.

Now there is another case in Texas where Jon Ginder has created securities fraud, but the Alabama case has nothing to do with this topic, so I am unsure why Max is trying to say it does.