InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 39
Posts 2702
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/20/2010

Re: burnout03 post# 7280

Thursday, 08/04/2011 11:21:04 AM

Thursday, August 04, 2011 11:21:04 AM

Post# of 38473
Not concluding prospective deals undermines UBRG 'hope value' as the basis of investment in this stock.

Management puts out optimistic PRs about future deals, at strategic times. The stock rises, on the hope value. Then, when the deals don't materialise you say that it doesn't matter?

I agree with you that those responsible for the deals are the ones that should be held to account. New management should not be blamed for deals put in place by previous management.

But none of the failed deals were put in place by previous management. The last deal promoted by Richard Craven was leasing the biodiesel plant to MIPCO. Current management did not negotiate or fail to conclude that deal.

The failed deals I have listed are all directly tied to the strategic plan developed by Messrs Ali and Guest.

I also agree with you that it's important to look at what has been achieved. My previous post focussed on failures in response to a demand to prove that the deals had fallen through.

Looking at what you see as having been achieved:

1. Gaining Market Share
UBRG did not increase the NDR market share, and ALL UBRG income came from gas sales made by NDR.
NDR is not a start-up company (it's been going at least 10 years) and NDR did not change its sales strategy after linking with UBRG.
NDR has always operated to a small margin (for reasons UBRG have detailed).
In summary: the link with UBRG did not temporarily reduce the NDR gross sales margin.

2. Investing to grow the business
The UBRG investment in NDR is very small. M&A costs have hardly moved from last year. That confirms that the majority (if not all) of $1m+ in M&A costs refer to UBRG overheads. They do not refer to investment in NDR.
I can't recall the investment in subsidiaries reported, but I'd be surprised if it exceeded $200k

3. Achieving elements of the New Strategy
I have no argument with you on the credibility of the new strategy. The 10k was well written and set out a sound strategy.
But, at the risk of repeating the obvious, the strategy is not yet in place.

Texas Gulf Oil & Gas - Let's wait and see what the Q2 10Q says
Progas joint venture - Let's wait and see what the Q2 10Q says
Progas Strikes oil - let's see how this is reported in the Q2 10Q
Increased margins - Let's see the gross margin reported in the 10Q
Buying gas from new suppliers - Let's see if gas is actually bought at 'direct from the wellhead' prices and margins improve
Extending trade credit - Let's see if there are new credit lines, and NDR no longer relies on seller's credit.

Different opinions make for a good board. But let's try to agree on the underlying facts.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.