InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 765
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/12/2003

Re: chipguy post# 57050

Monday, 06/06/2005 10:04:42 AM

Monday, June 06, 2005 10:04:42 AM

Post# of 97868
Chipguy, so you're not disappointed that Montvale was dressed down and now will be made available at 90nm (instead of at 65nm as was the plan)? That's a rather weird point of view if true.

Anyways so far all your performance estimates or frequency estimates for different versions of the Itanium chips though interesting were too positive, at least all those I read. By contrast your K8 estimates for single chip performance were more accurate iirc. I can't believe though you're not disappointed about Montvale not making it now to 65nm.

Regards,

Rink
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News