InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,712.69
(
-0.28%
)
US TECH 100
19,428.79
(
-0.35%
)
Dow Jones
41,794.60
(
-0.61%
)
Brent Oil
74.86
(
-0.34%
)
Bitcoin
67,658.20
(
-0.24%
)
Post# of 47856
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

retiredanalyst

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 94
Posts 2222
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/21/2011

retiredanalyst

Re: jerlegg post# 22606

Tuesday, 08/02/2011 8:29:39 PM

Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:29:39 PM

Post# of 47856
I see JerLegg. So you're suggesting that the company is intentionally not releasing the financial's because if they did release the financials the stock would take off, thus making the shares much more expensive for the company to buy back? Are you serious? I would think that if the company were holding back the financial's for the reason you're asserting, every shareholder in the stock would be just a little upset. Think about what your suggesting. It makes zero sense.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up