DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[mikenickels]

chrisbaskett - This is not Star Wars for me.
I don't use my pc on Saturday, so I did not have a chance to answer your post.

I think I am looking at this board in perhaps a more simplistic way than many of the members.

This is not Star Wars for me.

I just come to gather information and add my 2 cents. Whatever Dr. Frudaky's motives are, his concerns seem to me to be valid. Yes he was concentrating on the negative aspects, but they were, I feel, accurately portrayed. Since everyone else was busy singing the hymnals of DNAP, I felt that his posts were helpful in balancing the over all picture. Yes there are some exciting potentials in DNAP's future, and there is also a real danger that it won't last long enough to reach them. I think a thoughtful board should discuss both situations with as much factual honesty as possible, thereby clarifying for anyone accessing the board what the real risk/reward is. I think in the long run if DNAP is a good investment, it will rise to the top with or without this Board. I also think that trying to hide the blemishes just makes all the good news, posted over and over again look like so much propaganda. A board which is objective and balanced. where members don't get frazzled because someone has mentioned some liabilities, or taken an oppsoing position is a sign of health in the company and its stock. I have no problem with anyone disagreeing with Frudaky. I just feel that demonizing him for perfectly rational posts serves no good purpose. Do you disagree with him? Fine. Say so and say why. Back up your position with fact. Leave the personal stuff out. It's got nothing to do with DNAP.
regards..................