DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[Easyman51]

Arch, Chris; I have posted possitively about DnaPrint for a number of years, having believed, and still believe in what Tony started. As we address the possibilities and post accordingly, I believe that there is another "camp" who is currently contriving to demonstrate w/ demoralizing affect the current curancy value of the share price for whatever reason. I don't know what is their interest, though I can comment on their persistant, persuasive pen-ing.

I am allied, stauncly behind Dr. Frudakis and his dream, which in effect, I appropriated as my own. People do that when they can grasp that glimmer of a brighter future. This is not to say that my present is in anyway lacking, either monitary, emotional, or physically.

The problem here, as I can see it is that we are passengers in this futuristic vehicle that Tony built, but Richards in the drivers seat. Mores the pity. The finacial stability of DnaPrint is certainly open for critisism, as I hope to paste some questions for the BOD.

I know that some of the LONGS have voiced their displeasure w/ my editing, or lack of, concerning Dr. Frudakis. Todate, I have only deleted messages that I considered personal attacks, spamming or double posting. The Board Monitor, Matt, reviews everything, so I am comfortable w/ what is occuring, though I have to admit I am aware that those more wiley with the written word can formulate friction so it appears innocuous. Beyond that, I don't care to comment, as I try to remain somewhat reasonable in this responsibility.

Believe me, I would make a horendous Judge, but know that my perfect world would be mundane and bland, if it weren't for the balderdash delivered in this too and fro.

I understand real money is tied up here, which makes the controversy more than credible. My money is on the table w/ Tony, but I am certainly viewing the voracious appitite of the BOD w/ scepticism.

Peace, Blessings & Boat Drinks, Easy