Fibrocell Science Inc (FCSC)

[biolover]

The similarity should be obvious: both companies used a marketing pitch that a long-lasting, “semi-permanent” result was something to be desired. However, it turned out for both companies that robust demand for such semi-permanence never materialized.

In #msg-22443889, I pointed out that the docs trained by ARTE were performing 0.1 procedures per week, on average. I doubt that the docs trained by FCSC will do much better.

Apple claims they make great smart phone, and so does blackberry, does that means they are same company apple is a Gem and blackberry is a dirt. same way ARTE and FCSC both claim semipermanant results but arte was dirt as it was plastic like you favorite botox and fcsc is a gem like apple. LOL, now you understand u first grade student.