InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 296
Posts 31501
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/04/2008

Re: texkengold post# 239790

Wednesday, 07/27/2011 5:42:40 PM

Wednesday, July 27, 2011 5:42:40 PM

Post# of 375420
Lmao WHO said that? not James and NOT DB2 tex you are getting some really bad info - I mean worthless info --must be from joey




However, hearing the words rang clear in my ear from James on last Saturday that there would be no swap i.e PP, it did sting a great deal, because it is in the best interest to believe what is intended to be good.

The only remedy suggested by James was that if QASP shareholders wanted to be a part of NHSH was to sell their shares and use that money to buy NHSH shares well that is what I simply relayed. Now, if in fact my words were meant to distort the intent of an action by another company would not that company seek to hold me liable for interference? (this would be quite nefarious on my part).

*The Only Reason And I will Repeat It Again. The Only Reason Why James has opted to not go with the exchange i.e. PP is because he Feels That He Will Expose Himself To A Play That Joe would use to his advantage, and he is not willing to expose NHSH to any form of liability. So, his next move is to convert the remaining commons into Preferred "A" Shares, and focus on the existing shareholder base of 547 into NHSH already that were victimize as a result of the former ill's of the shell.