InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 2863
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/03/2009

Re: Alleyba1 post# 17417

Tuesday, 07/26/2011 4:53:29 PM

Tuesday, July 26, 2011 4:53:29 PM

Post# of 19697
gee, let me take a wild guess why the meeting was postponed. ipwg has no money to pay lawyers.
they haven't diluted any shares since may 2nd.
any volunteers out there willing to pay the lawyers?
so did you want them to go into the hearing without any legal counsel? or is a postponement more logical?

btw, i really don't know why this is a big deal. there is only one thing that really matters, and that's getting the financing. once they get the financing, imo, the chill will magically disappear. POOOF! because it will be bypassed with the issueing of new stock with a new name (ipwg, inc.), new cusip #, and probably with a decrease in the number of outstanding shares. NEW SHARES WOULD INSTANTLY FIX THE PROBLEM - BECAUSE THE NEW SHARES WOULD NOT BE TAINTED. plus the dtc would realize ipwg was not going to disappear, and would eventually have to deal with the legal consequences of the chill situation. so placing a chill on the new shares would only exacerbate their legal liability.

you may ask, then why haven't they done this already? BECAUSE IT COSTS A LOT OF MONEY, AND THEY DON'T HAVE THE MONEY + IT WOULD, IMO, REQUIRE UPDATING THE FINANCIALS (TO GET THE SEC TO APPROVE THE NEW ISSUE), WHICH WOULD COST MORE MONEY + PAYING THE LAWYERS INVOLVED, ETC. imo, this would run close to half a million dollars, or more.