![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/158678.png?cb=1661594561)
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 4:16:25 PM
The CEO, through the self-issuance of preferred shares, put himself in a position to take basically any action that he can get put up for a shareholder vote. Am I mistaken in believing that, as long as a transaction is disclosed as a "related party transaction", the fact that it was entered into based on a majority shareholder vote renders it legit?
I think the phrase "arms length transaction" was only included as a weak attempt at lending the transaction an air of propriety. But the fact that the phrase doesn't apply doesn't alter the legality of the transaction.
Am I mistaken?
I'm tryin ta think but nuttin happens......Curly
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM